skip to main content
Idioma:

Instrumentos de avaliação do transtorno de ansiedade social

Flávia de Lima Osório José Alexandre de Souza Crippa; Sônia Regina Loureiro

Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica São Paulo v. 32, n. 2, p. 73-83, 2005

São Paulo 2005

Localização: FMRP - Fac. Medicina de Ribeirão Preto    (pcd 1492092 )(Acessar)

  • Título:
    Instrumentos de avaliação do transtorno de ansiedade social
  • Autor: Flávia de Lima Osório
  • José Alexandre de Souza Crippa; Sônia Regina Loureiro
  • Assuntos: ANSIEDADE SOCIAL (AVALIAÇÃO)
  • É parte de: Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica São Paulo v. 32, n. 2, p. 73-83, 2005
  • Descrição: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is difficult to diagnose by clinicians, a fact that stimulates the study and development of instruments that will favor its early and systematic recognition. The objective of the present study was to identify in the literature indexed from 1999 to Ju1y 2004 articles related to psychometric studies on instruments for the assessment of SAD. A systematic search was performed in the Psycholnfo. Lilacs and Medline indexing services using the following key words: social phobia scale, social phobia validity, social pbobia reliability and social anxiety scale, with 26 papers being identified. For analysis, the studies were divided into two groups: a) Eleven regarding the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and b) Fifteen regarding other scales already validated or in the process of validation. Among the studies with the LSAS. six worked with the hetero-applied version and four with the self-applied version. identifying satisfact, ory psychometric qualities regardjng validity in the original language (English) and in other languages such as French. Hebrew. Turkish and Spanish. In addition, good reability indices were found. and regarding factorial analysis, the four-factor model was considered to be the most adequate. Among the studies using other scales. eight worked with instruments already validat.ed and seven with new scales, idenufying satisfactory values regarding validity and reliability. The main limitations pointed out in the
    studies surveyed were relared to the diversity of the gold standard adopted; sample composition with the absence or clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the small number of studies on non-clinical samples, impairing the use of the instruments for general population screening. Future studies are clearly needed to improve the valadation of the criterion based on factorial and cluster analysis
  • Editor: São Paulo
  • Data de criação/publicação: 2005
  • Formato: p. 73-83.
  • Idioma: Português
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.