skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Tags
e-Journals
e-Books
Databases
USP Libraries
Help
Help
Language:
English
Spanish
Portuguese (Brazil)
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
General Search
General Search
Physical Collection
Physical Collections
USP Intelectual Production
USP Production
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
General Search
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
General Search
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels
Apostolidis, Chrysostomos ; McLeay, Fraser
Food quality and preference, 2019-10, Vol.77, p.109-122
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
Elsevier Ltd
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
To meat or not to meat? Comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels
Author:
Apostolidis, Chrysostomos
;
McLeay, Fraser
Subjects:
Choice experiment
;
Empowered consumers
;
Food labels
;
Meat anti-consumption
;
Meat reducers
;
Sustainable consumption
Is Part Of:
Food quality and preference, 2019-10, Vol.77, p.109-122
Description:
•Using a choice experiment we evaluate preferences for sustainability labels.•We compare the preferences of meat eaters, meat reducers and vegetarians.•Type of meat, price and fat content labels have the largest overall impact on consumer choices.•Latent class analysis identified different segments within the three consumer groups. An increasing awareness of the impact of high levels of meat consumption on health and environmental sustainability is leading to a growing number of consumers reducing or avoiding meat. To address gaps in the literature, we compare and contrast the importance of the seven sustainability-related labels for three consumer groups (meat eaters, meat reducers and vegetarians) using a choice experiment involving 600 UK respondents (200 meat eaters, 200 meat reducers, 200 vegetarians). Type of meat, price and fat content labels have the largest overall impact on consumer choices. The impact of carbon footprint, method of production, origin and brand labels varies across consumer groups. We subsequently use latent class analysis to identify heterogeneous intra-group consumer segments, based on their preferences, and highlight the socio-demographic differences between them. For meat eaters, three consumer segments are identified (empowered, traditional and price conscious meat eaters). Meat reducers are divided into health curtailers and sustainable consumers, while only one segment of vegetarians is identified. By drawing on signalling theory and the consumer empowerment and anti-consumption literature, we identify links between sustainable consumption, consumer empowerment and anti-consumption and provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to utilise food labels to encourage more sustainable consumption.
Publisher:
Elsevier Ltd
Language:
English
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
6
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript