Idioma:

Inter-method reliability of paper surveys and computer assisted telephone interviews in a randomized controlled trial of yoga for low back pain

Cerrada, Christian J ; Weinberg, Janice ; Sherman, Karen J ; Saper, Robert B

BMC research notes, 2014-04, Vol.7 (1), p.227-227, Article 227 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Inter-method reliability of paper surveys and computer assisted telephone interviews in a randomized controlled trial of yoga for low back pain
Autor: Cerrada, Christian J ; Weinberg, Janice ; Sherman, Karen J ; Saper, Robert B
Assuntos: Adult ; Back pain ; Comparative analysis ; Data entry ; Female ; Health care ; Health facilities ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Likert scale ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Medical research ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Preventive medicine ; Quality of life ; Research Design ; Response rates ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone - utilization ; Treatment Outcome ; Yoga
É parte de: BMC research notes, 2014-04, Vol.7 (1), p.227-227, Article 227
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Descrição: Little is known about the reliability of different methods of survey administration in low back pain trials. This analysis was designed to determine the reliability of responses to self-administered paper surveys compared to computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for the primary outcomes of pain intensity and back-related function, and secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, SF-36, and global improvement among participants enrolled in a study of yoga for chronic low back pain. Pain intensity, back-related function, and both physical and mental health components of the SF-36 showed excellent reliability at all three time points; ICC scores ranged from 0.82 to 0.98. Pain medication use showed good reliability; kappa statistics ranged from 0.68 to 0.78. Patient satisfaction had moderate to excellent reliability; ICC scores ranged from 0.40 to 0.86. Global improvement showed poor reliability at 6 weeks (ICC = 0.24) and 12 weeks (ICC = 0.10). CATI shows excellent reliability for primary outcomes and at least some secondary outcomes when compared to self-administered paper surveys in a low back pain yoga trial. Having two reliable options for data collection may be helpful to increase response rates for core outcomes in back pain trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01761617. Date of trial registration: December 4, 2012.
Editor: England: BioMed Central Ltd
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Inter-method reliability of paper surveys and computer assisted telephone interviews in a randomized controlled trial of yoga for low back pain

Cerrada, Christian J ; Weinberg, Janice ; Sherman, Karen J ; Saper, Robert B

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.