skip to main content
Idioma:
Resultados 1 2 3 4 5 next page
Mostrar Somente
Refinado por: assunto: General & Internal Medicine remover
Result Number Material Type Add to My Shelf Action Record Details and Options
1
High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low‐quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high‐quality evidence
High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low‐quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high‐quality evidence
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low‐quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high‐quality evidence

Djulbegovic, Benjamin ; Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb ; Hozo, Iztok ; Koletsi, Despina ; Hemkens, Lars ; Price, Amy ; Riera, Rachel ; Nadanovsky, Paulo ; Santos, Ana Paula Pires ; Melo, Daniela ; Pathak, Ranjan ; Pacheco, Rafael Leite ; Fontes, Luis Eduardo ; Miranda, Enderson ; Nunan, David

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2022-06, Vol.28 (3), p.353-362 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
2
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?

Ma, Lin-Lu ; Wang, Yun-Yun ; Yang, Zhi-Hua ; Huang, Di ; Weng, Hong ; Zeng, Xian-Tao

Military medical research, 2020-02, Vol.7 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BioMed Central

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
3
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

Downes, Martin J ; Brennan, Marnie L ; Williams, Hywel C ; Dean, Rachel S

BMJ open, 2016-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e011458-e011458 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
4
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals

Turner, Lucy ; Shamseer, Larissa ; Altman, Douglas G ; Weeks, Laura ; Peters, Jodi ; Kober, Thilo ; Dias, Sofia ; Schulz, Kenneth F ; Plint, Amy C ; Moher, David ; Turner, Lucy

Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012-11, Vol.2013 (1), p.MR000030-MR000030 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
5
Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols
Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols

Farrah, Kelly ; Young, Kelsey ; Tunis, Matthew C ; Zhao, Linlu

Systematic reviews, 2019-11, Vol.8 (1), p.280-280, Article 280 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BioMed Central

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
6
The Case for Being a Medical Conservative
The Case for Being a Medical Conservative
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

The Case for Being a Medical Conservative

Mandrola, John ; Cifu, Adam ; Prasad, Vinay ; Foy, Andrew

The American journal of medicine, 2019-08, Vol.132 (8), p.900-901 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Elsevier Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
7
Intensive care nurses' well-being: A systematic review
Intensive care nurses' well-being: A systematic review
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Intensive care nurses' well-being: A systematic review

Jarden, Rebecca J. ; Sandham, Margaret ; Siegert, Richard J. ; Koziol-McLain, Jane

Australian critical care, 2020-01, Vol.33 (1), p.106-111 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Australia: Elsevier Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
8
The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies

Kennedy, Caitlin E ; Fonner, Virginia A ; Armstrong, Kevin A ; Denison, Julie A ; Yeh, Ping Teresa ; O'Reilly, Kevin R ; Sweat, Michael D

Systematic reviews, 2019-01, Vol.8 (1), p.3-3, Article 3 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BioMed Central

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
9
Critical appraisal of a statistical analysis: A novel visual guide
Critical appraisal of a statistical analysis: A novel visual guide
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Critical appraisal of a statistical analysis: A novel visual guide

Kuramoto, Lisa ; Marin, Mike ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J.

Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2024-03, Vol.17 (1), p.3-6 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
10
Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review
Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review

Cusack, Leila ; Del Mar, Chris B ; Chalmers, Iain ; Gibson, Elizabeth ; Hoffmann, Tammy C

Systematic reviews, 2018-05, Vol.7 (1), p.68-68, Article 68 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BioMed Central

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
Resultados 1 2 3 4 5 next page

Personalize Seus Resultados

  1. Editar

Refine Search Results

Expandir Meus Resultados

  1.   

Mostrar Somente

  1. Revistas revisadas por pares (117)

Data de Publicação 

De até
Refinar
  1. Antes de1996  (7)
  2. 1996Até2002  (34)
  3. 2003Até2009  (19)
  4. 2010Até2017  (24)
  5. Após 2017  (36)
  6. Mais opções open sub menu

Idioma 

  1. Inglês  (118)
  2. Japonês  (9)
  3. Norueguês  (2)
  4. Francês  (1)
  5. Coreano  (1)
  6. Mais opções open sub menu

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.