skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Português
Espanhol
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
LEGAL SUMMARIES: Pepperdine University School of Law Legal Summaries
J. NAALJ, Vol.23 pp.541-541, 2003
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
LEGAL SUMMARIES: Pepperdine University School of Law Legal Summaries
Assuntos:
Determinations
;
Administrators
;
Documentation
;
Administrator
;
Degenerative
;
Satisfactory
;
Recommended
;
Examination
;
Independent
;
Neurologist
;
Administrative Law
;
Bankruptcy Law
;
Business & Corporate Law
;
Civil Procedure
;
Civil Rights Law
;
Communications Law
;
Contracts Law
;
Criminal Law & Procedure
;
Environmental Law
;
Evidence
;
Family Law
;
Governments
;
Healthcare Law
;
Labor & Employment Law
;
Pensions & Benefits Law
;
Public Health & Welfare Law
;
Torts
É parte de:
J. NAALJ, Vol.23 pp.541-541, 2003
Descrição:
... LAW: ERISA does not require plan administrators to accord special deference to opinions of treating physicians. ... Under said rule, if a plan administrator rejects the opinions of a treating physician, it must come forward with specific reasons for its decision. ... IMPACT: This decision forces the National Labor Relations Board to present well-reasoned analyses for its decisions. ... ANALYSIS: The court reasoned that, under these circumstances, the board member's impartiality as a member of the tribunal could reasonably be called into question by the adversarial nature of her role as special assistant attorney general in a case in which complainant's counsel was her direct opponent. ... When the investigation does identify a specific alleged perpetrator of a supported incident of abuse, there must be substantial evidence indicating that the alleged perpetrator was responsible for the abuse or neglect. ... HOLDING: The court found that there was substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's decision to keep Covell's name in the central registry. ...
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in LexisNexis®(subscribers only)
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Página Inicial
RSS
Feed
Fale Conosco
