skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Português
Espanhol
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
HEALTH LAW
Michael Bagge
Syracuse L. Rev., Vol.50 pp.699-1317, 2000
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
HEALTH LAW
Autor:
Michael Bagge
Assuntos:
Incontestability
;
Straightforward
;
Rehabilitation
;
Instinctively
;
Discretionary
;
Jurisprudence
;
Professional
;
Complication
;
Satisfaction
;
Restrictions
;
Administrative Law
;
Business & Corporate Law
;
Civil Procedure
;
Criminal Law & Procedure
;
Education Law
;
Environmental Law
;
Governments
;
Healthcare Law
;
Insurance Law
;
Labor & Employment Law
;
Pensions & Benefits Law
;
Public Health & Welfare Law
;
Torts
É parte de:
Syracuse L. Rev., Vol.50 pp.699-1317, 2000
Descrição:
... This Survey year's developments in health law jurisprudence by the Court of Appeals have provided further evidence of consistent judicial deference to the discretionary authority of government in providing various health benefits to individuals. ... While the Court in Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Ford based its decision on the existence of a medical judgment to dispense with the need for a pre-transfer hearing, in Kuppersmith the fact that home care services eligibility was more than purely a medical determination sufficed to vest the administrative agency with decision-making authority and to ban the expression of medical opinion by the treating physician. ... Although Murphy v. Office of Vocational and Educational Services explicitly discussed the tension between the individual claimant and the limited funding available for publicly-funded health care, it is not difficult to discern that the fiscal implications which produced this peculiar regulation curtailing the content of communications by a treating physician also provoked the plaintiff's challenge and the Court's adherence to administrative discretion. ... Finally, the Court summarily rejected the claim that there should be an equitable limitation judicially imposed; the Medicaid agency is, after all, only trying to recover public moneys which have been previously expended to secure health care for the beneficiary who now has the resources to pay for their own care. ...
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in LexisNexis®(subscribers only)
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript