skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Comparison of the hinge flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves under aortic and mitral conditions

Simon, Hélène A ; Leo, Hwa-Liang ; Carberry, Josie ; Yoganathan, Ajit P

Annals of biomedical engineering, 2004-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1607-1617 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Springer Nature B.V

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Comparison of the hinge flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves under aortic and mitral conditions
  • Autor: Simon, Hélène A ; Leo, Hwa-Liang ; Carberry, Josie ; Yoganathan, Ajit P
  • Assuntos: Aorta ; Biomedical Engineering ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Heart, Artificial ; Humans ; Mitral Valve ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Pulsatile Flow ; Stress, Mechanical ; Thrombosis
  • É parte de: Annals of biomedical engineering, 2004-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1607-1617
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-1
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Article-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
  • Descrição: Animal and clinical studies have shown that bileaflet mechanical heart valve designs are plagued by thromboembolic complications, with higher rates in the mitral than in the aortic position. This study evaluated the hinge flow dynamic of the 23 mm St. Jude Medical (SJM) Regent and the 23 mm CarboMedics (CM) valves under aortic conditions and compared these results with previous findings under mitral conditions. Velocity and Reynolds shear stress fields were captured using two-component laser Doppler velocimetry. Under aortic conditions, both the SJM and CM hinge flow fields exhibited a strong forward flow pattern during systole (maximum velocities of 2.31 and 1.75 m/s, respectively) and two main leakage jets during diastole (maximum velocities of 3.08 and 2.27 m/s, respectively). Aortic and mitral flow patterns within the two hinges were similar, but with a more dynamic flow during the forward flow phase under aortic conditions. Velocity magnitudes and shear stresses measured under mitral conditions were generally higher than those obtained in the aortic position, which may explain the higher rates of thromboembolism in the mitral implants when compared with the aortic implants.
  • Editor: United States: Springer Nature B.V
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.