skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Historical Archaeology in Africa: An Appropriate Concept?
Connah, Graham
The African archaeological review, 2007-06, Vol.24 (1/2), p.35-40
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Historical Archaeology in Africa: An Appropriate Concept?
Autor:
Connah, Graham
Assuntos:
Academic discipline
;
Africa
;
African history
;
Archaeological methods
;
Archaeology
;
Associations
;
Colonial literature
;
Conceptualization
;
Continents
;
Generalities
;
Historical archaeology
;
Material culture
;
Methodology
;
Oral history
;
Organisation and history of research
;
Paleoanthropology
;
Prehistory
;
Prehistory and protohistory
;
Regional analysis
;
Research trends
;
Sociology and Anthropology
;
United States history
É parte de:
The African archaeological review, 2007-06, Vol.24 (1/2), p.35-40
Notas:
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Descrição:
The term ' historical archaeology' originated in the United States and was subsequently adopted in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, all places subjected to European colonization during the last few centuries. The idea of historical archaeology has had relatively little application in Europe, birthplace of the antithetical idea of prehistory. In Africa, other than at the southern tip of the continent, the practice of what is called historical archaeology has developed only recently and the relevance of the concept in Africa might be questioned. There are chronological problems in its application: not only are the interfaces between preliterate and literate societies spread over thousands of years in different areas but they can at times be regressive. The matter is further complicated if the term historical archaeology is used for societies whose history is oral not written. However, there is an ambiguity in this concept that also has methodological and other connotations. In these respects the idea of historical archaeology does perhaps have a place in Africa as a whole, but it represents a compartmentalization of our discipline still inadequately defined. Le concept d' « archéologie historique » a pour origine les États-Unis et a ensuite été adopté au Canada, en Australie, en Nouvelle Zélande et en Afrique du Sud. Autrement dit, dans tous les pays qui ont fait l'objet d'une colonisation lors des siècles derniers. L'idée d'archéologie historique est peu répandue en Europe où prévaut la notion antithétique de préhistoire. En Afrique, mise à part l'extrémité sud du continent, la pratique de ce que l'on appelle l'archéologie historique s'est développée uniquement récemment ; aussi la pertinence de ce concept pourrait être remise en cause. Il existe des problèmes chronologiques qui ont une incidence sur son application : non seulement les interfaces entre les sociétés pré-alphabétisées et alphabétisées s'étendent dans différentes zones sur plusieurs milliers d'années, mais elles peuvent parfois être régressives. Le sujet se complique davantage si le concept d'archéologie historique est utilisé pour des sociétés dont l'histoire est orale et non écrite. Il existe alors une ambiguïté qui a des incidences méthodologiques et autres. Sous ce rapport, l'idée d'archéologie historique a sans doute une raison d'être en Afrique dans son ensemble, mais représente une compartimentalisation encore inadéquatement définie de notre discipline.
Editor:
Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in Pascal Francis
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript