skip to main content
Primo Search
Search in: Busca Geral

0.125% 8 ml/h v.s. 0.25% 8 ml/h of levobupivacaine in continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study

Kawase, Sayuri ; Horiuchi, Toshinori ; Nagahata, Toshihiro

Journal of anesthesia, 2023-02, Vol.37 (1), p.6-12 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    0.125% 8 ml/h v.s. 0.25% 8 ml/h of levobupivacaine in continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study
  • Autor: Kawase, Sayuri ; Horiuchi, Toshinori ; Nagahata, Toshihiro
  • Assuntos: Analgesia ; Analgesia - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthesiology ; Bupivacaine ; Clinical trials ; Critical Care Medicine ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency Medicine ; Humans ; Intensive ; Levobupivacaine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nausea ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Patient satisfaction ; Remifentanil ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
  • É parte de: Journal of anesthesia, 2023-02, Vol.37 (1), p.6-12
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Undefined-3
  • Descrição: Purpose Research has shown that a higher dose of bupivacaine administered in continuous paravertebral block (CPVB) provides a greater analgesic effect after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this randomized, controlled, double-blind study, we hypothesized that 0.25% 8 ml/h of levobupivacaine administered in CPVB after VATS provides a greater analgesic effect than 0.125% 8 ml/h. Methods Fifty patients who underwent unilateral VATS were randomized to receive a postoperative continuous infusion of 0.125% (low group, n  = 25) or 0.25% (high group, n  = 25) levobupivacaine at 8 mL/h for CPVB. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score during coughing on the morning of postoperative day (POD) 1. The secondary outcomes were the VAS scores at rest and during coughing on POD 2, the number of anesthetized dermatomes, the frequency of rescue analgesics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, and adverse events and complications. Results There was no significant difference in the VAS score during coughing on the morning of POD 1 between the low and high groups [median, 37.5 (interquartile range 21–50) vs. 40.0 (interquartile range 21–50), respectively; p  = 0.79]. Similarly, there were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions Levobupivacaine at 0.25% 8 ml/h in CPVB did not provide better analgesia after VATS over 0.125% 8 ml/h. Clinical trial registration number UMIN000037930
  • Editor: Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.