skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Levels of Interpersonal Trust Across Different Types of Environment: The Micro-Macro Interplay Between Relational Distance and Human Ecology

Jing, Yiming ; Cai, Huajian ; Bond, Michael Harris ; Li, Yang ; Stivers, Adam W. ; Tan, Qianbao Cowan, Nelson

Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2021-07, Vol.150 (7), p.1438-1457 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: American Psychological Association

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Levels of Interpersonal Trust Across Different Types of Environment: The Micro-Macro Interplay Between Relational Distance and Human Ecology
  • Autor: Jing, Yiming ; Cai, Huajian ; Bond, Michael Harris ; Li, Yang ; Stivers, Adam W. ; Tan, Qianbao
  • Cowan, Nelson
  • Assuntos: Ecology ; Female ; Foreign Language Translation ; Human ; Interpersonal Relationships ; Male ; Nature (Environment) ; Personal relationships ; Psychological Distance ; Scientists ; Society ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sociopolitical factors ; Systematic review ; Test Construction ; Threat ; Trust ; Trust (Social Behavior)
  • É parte de: Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2021-07, Vol.150 (7), p.1438-1457
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Social and behavioral scientists have long investigated the relationship between interpersonal trust and features of the environment. However, it remains unclear how the microenvironment of relational distance (i.e., social proximity between 2 persons) interacts with the macroenvironment of human ecology (i.e., social and natural environments) to predict people's levels of trusting other persons. In this research, we tackled this puzzle using diverse methodologies (e.g., meta-analysis, experiment, and multilevel analysis) and large, cultural-group samples. Four studies found that, across many countries (e.g., 77 countries in Study 3) and regions within a country (e.g., 28 Chinese provinces in Study 4), members of these social units trusted close others (e.g., family members) more than distant others (e.g., strangers). However, this general effect of relational distance was stronger in societies embedded within more restrictive cultural, sociopolitical, and natural ecologies (e.g., a more collectivistic cultural logic, less developed socioeconomic and political institutions, and a stronger threat of infectious diseases, such as HCV infection). More importantly, people's attitudinal trust of distant others was higher in countries or regions with less restrictive ecocultural features, but such differences often disappeared in the context of trusting close others. Compared with other sociopolitical and natural features, the societal culture of collectivism often was a unique explanatory variable for the micro-macro interplay of current interest. These converging pieces of evidence provide a clear view of how levels of interpersonal trust vary as a function of relational distance and ecocultural environments simultaneously.
  • Editor: United States: American Psychological Association
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.