skip to main content
Idioma:

Collection and Use of Social Determinants of Health Data in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Wards: A Scoping Review

Davis, Victoria H. ; Rodger, Laura ; Pinto, Andrew D.

Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2023-02, Vol.38 (2), p.480-489 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Collection and Use of Social Determinants of Health Data in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Wards: A Scoping Review
  • Autor: Davis, Victoria H. ; Rodger, Laura ; Pinto, Andrew D.
  • Assuntos: Data collection ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Food security ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Internal Medicine ; Malnutrition ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Social Determinants of Health ; Social factors ; Social interactions ; Systematic Review
  • É parte de: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2023-02, Vol.38 (2), p.480-489
  • Notas: SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Undefined-2
    ObjectType-Review-1
    ObjectType-Article-3
  • Descrição: Background There is growing interest in incorporating social determinants of health (SDoH) data collection in inpatient hospital settings to inform patient care. However, there is limited information on this data collection and its use in inpatient general internal medicine (GIM). This scoping review sought to describe the current state of the literature on SDoH data collection and its application to patient care in inpatient GIM settings. Methods English-language searches on MedLine, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PsycINFO were conducted from 2000 to April 2021. Studies reporting systematic data collection or use of at least three SDoH, sociodemographic, or social needs variables in inpatient hospital GIM settings were included. Four independent reviewers screened abstracts, and two reviewers screened full-text articles. Results A total of 8190 articles underwent abstract screening and eight were included. A range of SDoH tools were used, such as THRIVE, PRAPARE, WHO-Quality of Life, Measuring Health Equity, and a biopsychosocial framework. The most common SDoH were food security or malnutrition ( n =7), followed by housing, transportation, employment, education, income, functional status and disability, and social support ( n =5 each). Four of the eight studies applied the data to inform patient care, and three provided community resource referrals. Discussion There is limited evidence to guide the collection and use of SDoH data in inpatient GIM settings. This review highlights the need for integrated care, the role of the electronic health record, and social history taking, all of which may benefit from more robust SDoH data collection. Future research should examine the feasibility and acceptability of SDoH integration in inpatient GIM settings.
  • Editor: Cham: Springer International Publishing
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.