skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor to Consumer Protection

Bibas, Stephanos

California law review, 2011-08, Vol.99 (4), p.1117-1161 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Berkeley CA United States of America: Joe Christensen, Inc. for students of School of Law, University of California, Berkeley

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor to Consumer Protection
  • Autor: Bibas, Stephanos
  • Assuntos: Attorneys ; Consumer protection ; Criminal defense attorneys ; Criminal justice ; Criminal pleas ; Criminal procedure ; Criminal sentencing ; Defendants ; Essay ; Guilty verdicts ; Judicial power ; Plea bargaining ; Plea bargains ; Pleas ; Prosecuting attorneys ; Sentences (Criminal procedure) ; Studies ; Supreme Court decisions ; Trials
  • É parte de: California law review, 2011-08, Vol.99 (4), p.1117-1161
  • Notas: California Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 4, Aug 2011, 1117-1161
    Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
  • Descrição: Padilla v. Kentucky was a watershed in the U.S. Supreme Court's turn to regulating plea bargaining. For decades, the Court had focused on jury trials as the central subject of criminal procedure, with only modest and ineffective procedural regulation of guilty pleas. This older view treated trials as the norm, was indifferent to sentencing, trusted judges and juries to protect innocence, and drew clean lines excluding civil proceedings and collateral consequences from its purview. In United States v. Ruiz in 2002, the Court began to focus on the realities of the plea process itself, but did so only halfway. Not until Padilla last year did the Court regulate plea bargaining's substantive calculus, its attendant sentencing decisions, the lawyers who run it, and related collateral civil consequences. Padilla marks the eclipse of Justice Scalia's formalist originalism, the parting triumph of Justice Stevens's common-law incrementalism, and the rise of the two realistic exprosecutors on the Court, Justices Alito and Sotomayor. To complete Padilla's unfinished business, the Court and legislatures should look to consumer protection law to regulate at least the process if not the substance of plea bargaining.
  • Editor: Berkeley CA United States of America: Joe Christensen, Inc. for students of School of Law, University of California, Berkeley
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.