skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
The Imaginal Bond of “Empire” and “Civilization” in Eurasian History
Crossley, Pamela Kyle
Verge (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2016-09, Vol.2 (2), p.84-114
[Periódico revisado por pares]
University of Minnesota Press
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
The Imaginal Bond of “Empire” and “Civilization” in Eurasian History
Autor:
Crossley, Pamela Kyle
Assuntos:
1600-1899 Qing dynasty period
;
1700-1799
;
Abbasid Caliphate
;
Analysis
;
Aristocracy
;
Buddhism
;
Capital cities
;
Chinese literature
;
civilization
;
Civilization, Classical
;
Civilization, Greco-Roman
;
Classical civilization
;
Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des Romains et de leur décadence
;
Elites
;
Emperors
;
empire
;
English literature
;
Er shi er shi zha ji
;
Essays
;
French literature
;
Gibbon, Edward
;
Han dynasty, 207 BC-220 AD
;
historical change
;
Influence
;
Islam
;
Legacies
;
Military culture
;
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat, baron de la BRÈde et de
;
Narrative history
;
prose
;
Roman Empire, 30 BC-476 AD
;
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
;
Wang Fuzhi
;
Zhao Yi
É parte de:
Verge (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2016-09, Vol.2 (2), p.84-114
Descrição:
The ecologies of presence of what we call ancient or medieval empires were profoundly different from those of modern empires. Practical problems of distance and social penetration suggest that early hegemony was a matter of military visibility and the maintenance of economic networks that could rivet the loyalty of local elites, not of cultural emanation from imperial centers. The illusory coherence of earlier empires was largely the creation of later rulers and elites seeking legitimation and justifications for conquest. This applies to issues of the spatiality of early domains but is even more relevant to claims of modern empires to have inherited grand civilizational legacies and responsibilities of curatorship. Not until the early modern period could large-scale conquest regimes achieve direct, sustained cultural contact with civil populations—the environment in which the myth of deep imperial cultural legacies was generated and inculcated. Nationalists of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries found the cultural postures of the large conquest empires indigestible in their totality but useful when tailored to nationalist agendas.
Editor:
University of Minnesota Press
Idioma:
Inglês
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:("USP"),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript