Idioma:

The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact

Spriggs, James F.

American journal of political science, 1996-11, Vol.40 (4), p.1122-1151 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Austin, Tex: University of Wisconsin Press

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact
Autor: Spriggs, James F.
Assuntos: Administrative agencies ; Administrative courts ; Administrative law ; Bureaucracy ; Court costs ; Dissenting opinions ; FEDERALISM ; Government bureaucracy ; Judicial Behavior ; Judicial process ; Judicial rulings ; Judiciary-legislative relations ; Legal proceedings ; Litigants ; Policy making ; Public Administration ; Supreme Court ; SUPREME COURT (ALL NATIONS) ; Theory ; THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States Supreme Court opinions
É parte de: American journal of political science, 1996-11, Vol.40 (4), p.1122-1151
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
Descrição: Government bureaucracies are strategic and implement Supreme Court opinions based upon the costs and benefits of alternative policy choices. Agencies develop these expectations from prevailing resource environments and bureaucracies are more likely to establish larger policy change when resources favor the Court because the costs of not changing their policies appear larger. The amount of bureaucratic policy change due to Court opinions is a function of: (1) attributes of Supreme Court opinions--specificity of Court-ordered policy change, basis of opinions, remands, and dissents; (2) agency characteristics--policy preferences, type of proceedings, and time preferences; and (3) external actors--amicus curiae, opposing litigants, Congress, and presidents. An Ordered Probit analysis tests a multivariate model of the impact of every Supreme Court opinion reversing or remanding a federal agency decision from the 1953 through 1990 terms. Agency policy change after Court opinions is influenced by the specificity of Supreme Court opinions, agency policy preferences, agency age, and amicus curiae support.
Editor: Austin, Tex: University of Wisconsin Press
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact

Spriggs, James F.

Austin, Tex: University of Wisconsin Press

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.