skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas

Oldekop, J. A ; Holmes, G ; Harris, W. E ; Evans, K. L

Conservation biology, 2016-02, Vol.30 (1), p.133-141 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas
  • Autor: Oldekop, J. A ; Holmes, G ; Harris, W. E ; Evans, K. L
  • Assuntos: anthropogenic activities ; biodiversidad ; Biodiversity ; biological resources ; collaborative management ; compensaciones ; Conservation ; conservation areas ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; desarrollo ; Environmental protection ; Humans ; livelihood ; management ; manejo ; meta-analysis ; new conservation ; nueva conservación ; probability ; Social Change ; Social impact ; socioeconomic development ; Socioeconomic Factors ; stakeholders ; trade-offs ; Wilderness areas
  • É parte de: Conservation biology, 2016-02, Vol.30 (1), p.133-141
  • Notas: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568
    ArticleID:COBI12568
    istex:AB279A076E4B94D0F26948103250219D24560D26
    A global map of protected areas contained in the IUCN and UNEP world database on protected areas and how our sample of studies compares with the information contained within the database (Appendix S1), the selection path for research articles and case studies (Appendix S2), the number of protected areas associated with specific impacts and socioeconomic and conservation outcomes within our sample (Appendix S3), representative variable importance plots for random forest analysis (Appendix S4 - S5), tables containing bootstrapped model parameters, coefficients, and confidence intervals for all regression analyses (Appendix S6 - S13), and a list of the articles included in our analysis (Appendix S14) are available online. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of the material) should be directed to the corresponding author.
    ark:/67375/WNG-94FHDP3N-H
    ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-1
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Protected areas (PAs) are a key strategy for protecting biological resources, but they vary considerably in their effectiveness and are frequently reported as having negative impacts on local people. This has contributed to a divisive and unresolved debate concerning the compatibility of environmental and socioeconomic development goals. Elucidating the relationship between positive and negative social impacts and conservation outcomes of PAs is key for the development of more effective and socially just conservation. We conducted a global meta‐analysis on 165 PAs using data from 171 published studies. We assessed how PAs affect the well‐being of local people, the factors associated with these impacts, and crucially the relationship between PAs’ conservation and socioeconomic outcomes. Protected areas associated with positive socioeconomic outcomes were more likely to report positive conservation outcomes. Positive conservation and socioeconomic outcomes were more likely to occur when PAs adopted comanagement regimes, empowered local people, reduced economic inequalities, and maintained cultural and livelihood benefits. Whereas the strictest regimes of PA management attempted to exclude anthropogenic influences to achieve biological conservation objectives, PAs that explicitly integrated local people as stakeholders tended to be more effective at achieving joint biological conservation and socioeconomic development outcomes. Strict protection may be needed in some circumstances, yet our results demonstrate that conservation and development objectives can be synergistic and highlight management strategies that increase the probability of maximizing both conservation performance and development outcomes of PAs.
  • Editor: United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.