Idioma:

An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods

Tricco, Andrea C ; Zarin, Wasifa ; Antony, Jesmin ; Hutton, Brian ; Moher, David ; Sherifali, Diana ; Straus, Sharon E

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-02, Vol.70, p.61-67 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Elsevier Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods
Autor: Tricco, Andrea C ; Zarin, Wasifa ; Antony, Jesmin ; Hutton, Brian ; Moher, David ; Sherifali, Diana ; Straus, Sharon E
Assuntos: Access to information ; Bias ; Consensus ; Decision making ; Delphi ; Delphi Technique ; Epidemiology ; Full text ; Grey literature ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Internal Medicine ; Internationality ; Internet ; Knowledge synthesis ; Language ; Methods ; Quality ; Rapid review ; Review Literature as Topic ; Studies ; Survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review
É parte de: Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-02, Vol.70, p.61-67
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Descrição: Abstract Objectives To solicit experiences with and perceptions of rapid reviews from stakeholders, including researchers, policy makers, industry, journal editors, and health care providers. Study Design and Setting An international survey of rapid review producers and modified Delphi. Results Forty rapid review producers responded on our survey (63% response rate). Eighty-eight rapid reviews with 31 different names were reported. Rapid review commissioning organizations were predominantly government (78%) and health care (58%) organizations. Several rapid review approaches were identified, including updating the literature search of previous reviews (92%); limiting the search strategy by date of publication (88%); and having only one reviewer screen (85%), abstract data (84%), and assess the quality of studies (86%). The modified Delphi included input from 113 stakeholders on the rapid review approaches from the survey. Approach 1 (search limited by date and language; study selection by one reviewer only, and data abstraction and quality appraisal conducted by one reviewer and one verifier) was ranked the most feasible (72%, 81/113 responses), with the lowest perceived risk of bias (12%, 12/103); it also ranked second in timeliness (37%, 38/102) and fifth in comprehensiveness (5%, 5/100). Conclusion Rapid reviews have many names and approaches, and some methods might be more desirable than others.
Editor: United States: Elsevier Inc
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods

Tricco, Andrea C ; Zarin, Wasifa ; Antony, Jesmin ; Hutton, Brian ; Moher, David ; Sherifali, Diana ; Straus, Sharon E

United States: Elsevier Inc

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.