skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Biomechanical studies: Science (f)or common sense?
Mellema, Jos J ; Doornberg, Job N ; Guitton, Thierry G ; Ring, David
Injury, 2014-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2035-2039
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Biomechanical studies: Science (f)or common sense?
Autor:
Mellema, Jos J
;
Doornberg, Job N
;
Guitton, Thierry G
;
Ring, David
Assuntos:
Biomechanical
;
Biomechanical Phenomena
;
Fixation
;
Fracture
;
Fracture Fixation - education
;
Fracture Fixation - methods
;
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
;
Fractures, Bone - physiopathology
;
Fractures, Bone - surgery
;
Humans
;
Judgment
;
Observer Variation
;
Orthopaedic
;
Orthopedics
;
Professional Competence - standards
;
Radiography
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Research Report - standards
;
Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data
;
Surgeons - statistics & numerical data
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Treatment Outcome
É parte de:
Injury, 2014-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2035-2039
Notas:
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Descrição:
Abstract Introduction It is our impression that many biomechanical studies invest substantial resources studying the obvious: that more and larger metal is stronger. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if a subset of biomechanical studies comparing fixation constructs just document common sense. Methods Using a web-based survey, 274 orthopaedic surgeons and 81 medical students predicted the results of 11 biomechanical studies comparing fracture fixation constructs (selected based on the authors’ sense that the answer was obvious prior to performing the study). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated according to standard formulas. The agreement among the observers was calculated by using a multirater kappa, described by Siegel and Castellan. Results The accuracy of predicting outcomes was 80% or greater for 10 of 11 studies. Accuracy was not influenced by level of experience (i.e., time in practice and medical students vs. surgeons). There were substantial differences in accuracy between observers from different regions. The overall categorical rating of inter-observer reliability according to Landis and Koch was moderate ( κ = 0.55; standard error (SE) = 0.01). Conclusion The results of a subset of biomechanical studies comparing fracture fixation constructs can be predicted prior to doing the study. As these studies are time and resource intensive, one criterion for proceeding with a biomechanical study should be that the answer is not simply a matter of common sense.
Editor:
Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
View record from Swedish Publication Index
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript