skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Person-centered Health Research

Mitchell, Gordon R. ; Hartelius, E. Johanna ; McCoy, David ; McTigue, Kathleen M.

Social epistemology, 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.21-42 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Abingdon: Routledge

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Person-centered Health Research
  • Autor: Mitchell, Gordon R. ; Hartelius, E. Johanna ; McCoy, David ; McTigue, Kathleen M.
  • Assuntos: Case studies ; Clinical outcomes ; deliberation ; Groups ; Health care ; Health research ; Health services ; Medical research ; Narratives ; Openness ; Patients ; Person centred approach ; person-centered healthcare ; rhetoric ; Social learning ; Stakeholder engagement ; Stakeholders ; Textual analysis ; Updating ; Usefulness
  • É parte de: Social epistemology, 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.21-42
  • Descrição: Robust stakeholder engagement in health research requires broad communicative integration, not only of patients but also other stakeholders such as health system leaders, clinicians, and researchers. As patients' personal narratives tend to focus on their own health care experiences, it can be challenging to incorporate these perspectives at the health system level, where discussions often address technical issues such as strategies for aggregating and interpreting population-level data. The PaTH Health System Leaders Demonstration Project provides a case study to explore the potential usefulness of deliberative techniques for facilitating heterogeneous stakeholder engagement in what some sociologists of science call 'hybid forums.' Close textual analysis of the event transcript yields insight on how social learning motivates group opinion shifts in deliberative processes. Reconstruction of the event's narrative arc marks a path of 'dynamic updating' that manifests in group opinion change. Analysis of episodes where participants perform 'deliberative openness' lends qualitative nuance to previously reported process measure outcomes reflecting high participant satisfaction. Such inquiry helps address a gap in literature on stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness health research, sheds light on the understudied genre of 'empowered deliberation', and illustrates design principles and practices useful for upstream integration of stakeholder engagement in the research process.
  • Editor: Abingdon: Routledge
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.