Idioma:

Pluralism and Distrust: How Courts Can Support Democracy by Lowering the Stakes of Politics

Eskridge, William N.

The Yale law journal, 2005-04, Vol.114 (6), p.1279-1328

New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Pluralism and Distrust: How Courts Can Support Democracy by Lowering the Stakes of Politics
Autor: Eskridge, William N.
Assuntos: Abortion ; Activists ; Apartheid ; Censorship ; Civil rights ; Constitutional law ; Criminal law ; Democracy ; Discourse ; Due process of law ; Ely, John Hart ; Equal rights ; Gay rights ; Influence ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial review ; Judicial reviews ; Jurisprudence ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Pluralism ; Pluralist school ; Political activism ; Political participation ; Political pluralism ; Political power ; Political processes ; Political representation ; Political science ; Political socialization ; Politics ; Prejudice ; Race ; Rule of law ; Same sex marriage ; Segregation ; Social activism ; Social movements ; Society ; Sodomy ; State court decisions ; Stereotypes
É parte de: The Yale law journal, 2005-04, Vol.114 (6), p.1279-1328
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Descrição: John Hart Ely argued that judicial review is most appropriate when democratic politics has broken down. Professor Eskridge argues that judicial review is also appropriate to lower the stakes of pluralist politics. Stakes get high when the system becomes embroiled in bitter disputes that drive salient, productive groups away from political engagement. Groups disengage when they believe that participation in the system is pointless due to their permanent defeat on fundamental issues or their perception that the process is stacked against them, or when politics imposes burdens threatening their group identity. At the Founding, religion was the best example of high-stakes politics, and the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment were designed to lower the stakes of religion-based politics. Pluralism-facilitating judicial review generalizes the stakesmanaging principles of the Religion Clauses to suggest applications of the Free Speech, Due Process, and Equal Protection Clauses to issues ranging from abortion protests and same-sex marriage to English-only laws and the war on terrorism.
Editor: New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Pluralism and Distrust: How Courts Can Support Democracy by Lowering the Stakes of Politics

Eskridge, William N.

New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.