Idioma:

Evaluation of environmental conditions as a decontamination approach for SARS‐CoV‐2 when applied to common library, archive and museum‐related materials

Richter, William R. ; Sunderman, Michelle M. ; Mera, Tom O. ; O'Brien, Kim A. ; Morgan, Kendra ; Streams, Sharon

Journal of applied microbiology, 2022-04, Vol.132 (4), p.3405-3415 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Evaluation of environmental conditions as a decontamination approach for SARS‐CoV‐2 when applied to common library, archive and museum‐related materials
Autor: Richter, William R. ; Sunderman, Michelle M. ; Mera, Tom O. ; O'Brien, Kim A. ; Morgan, Kendra ; Streams, Sharon
Assuntos: archives ; Archives & records ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID‐19 ; Deactivation ; Decontamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Disinfectants ; Environmental conditions ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Inactivation ; Libraries ; Museums ; Original ; persistence ; plastic ; Porous materials ; Quantitation ; Relative humidity ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Test chambers ; Virus Inactivation ; Viruses
É parte de: Journal of applied microbiology, 2022-04, Vol.132 (4), p.3405-3415
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Descrição: Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ambient or altered environmental conditions on the inactivation of SARS‐CoV‐2 applied to materials common in libraries, archives and museums. Methods and Results Porous and non‐porous materials (e.g. paper, plastic protective book cover) were inoculated with approximately 1 × 105 TCID50 SARS CoV‐2 (USA‐WA1/2020), dried, placed within test chamber in either a stacked or unstacked configuration, and exposed to environmental conditions ranging from 4 to 29°C at 40 ± 10% relative humidity. The amount of infectious SARS‐CoV‐2 was then assessed at various timepoints from 0 to 10 days. Ambient conditions resulted in varying inactivation rates per material type. Virus inactivation rate decreased when materials were stacked or at colder temperatures. Virus inactivation rate increased when materials were unstacked or at warmer temperatures. Conclusions SARS‐CoV‐2 at ambient conditions resulted in the inactivation of virus below limit of quantitation (LOQ) for all materials by Day 8. Warmer temperatures, for a subset of materials, increased SARS‐CoV‐2 inactivation, and all were
Editor: England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Evaluation of environmental conditions as a decontamination approach for SARS‐CoV‐2 when applied to common library, archive and museum‐related materials

Richter, William R. ; Sunderman, Michelle M. ; Mera, Tom O. ; O'Brien, Kim A. ; Morgan, Kendra ; Streams, Sharon

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.