skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Practice of academic and applicative archaeology in Slovenia from a social epistemological perspective

Novaković, Predrag

Ars & humanitas, 2023-01, Vol.17 (2), p.41 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Practice of academic and applicative archaeology in Slovenia from a social epistemological perspective
  • Autor: Novaković, Predrag
  • Assuntos: academic archaeology ; archaeological practice ; Archaeology ; Epistemology ; Practice research ; preventive archaeology ; Slovene archaeology ; social epistemology
  • É parte de: Ars & humanitas, 2023-01, Vol.17 (2), p.41
  • Descrição: In the relatively abundant bibliography on archaeological theory and epistemology the impact of archaeological practice on archaeological epistemology has remained somehow less explored despite the fact that in the last three decades archaeology has undergone radical changes in practice. We would like to point to three interconnected trends: an exceptional increase in the amount of archaeological fieldwork, the fact that probably more than 90% of all field projects are in the domain of heritage protection, and that archaeology has become a data-driven discipline, producing new circumstances which challenge the traditional epistemological views and require social epistemological rethinking. This paper aims to explore some social epistemological aspects in current archaeological practice in Slovenia where two rather distinctive groups of archaeological researchers emerged, academic archaeologists and field professionals. The distinction between the two groups has grown since the late 1990s with the introduction of preventive archaeology, changes in legislation in heritage protection, and the development of the commercial sector in archaeology. These changes opened a series of questions on epistemic effects in new circumstances, e.g. how these two groups contribute to archaeological knowledge, how their modes of obtaining knowledge are structured and organized, what social factors condition these modes, and, least but not last, the question of forms of epistemic asymmetries.
  • Editor: Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts
  • Idioma: Inglês;Alemão
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.