skip to main content
Primo Search
Search in: Busca Geral

Comparative Study of Multifunctional Irrigation-assisted Vacuum Drainage, Vacuum Sealing Drainage and the Penrose Drain in Treating Severe Multi-space Deep Fascial Infection in the Head and Neck

Qian, Yuanyi ; He, Di ; Qi, HaoZhao ; Zhang, Tian ; Fu, Tao ; Yu, Menghua ; Yan, Qin ; Cai, Zhuoying ; Liu, Yanming

World journal of surgery, 2022-12, Vol.46 (12), p.2973-2983 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Comparative Study of Multifunctional Irrigation-assisted Vacuum Drainage, Vacuum Sealing Drainage and the Penrose Drain in Treating Severe Multi-space Deep Fascial Infection in the Head and Neck
  • Autor: Qian, Yuanyi ; He, Di ; Qi, HaoZhao ; Zhang, Tian ; Fu, Tao ; Yu, Menghua ; Yan, Qin ; Cai, Zhuoying ; Liu, Yanming
  • Assuntos: Abdominal Surgery ; Antibiotics ; Cardiac Surgery ; Comparative studies ; Cost analysis ; Disease control ; Drainage - methods ; General Surgery ; Head and neck ; Headspace ; Humans ; Infections ; Irrigation ; Lavage ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neck ; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods ; Original Scientific Report ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Sealing ; Surgery ; Surgical drains ; Thoracic Surgery ; Vacuum ; Vascular Surgery ; Workload ; Workloads ; Wound drainage
  • É parte de: World journal of surgery, 2022-12, Vol.46 (12), p.2973-2983
  • Notas: Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self‐archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
    Yuanyi Qian and Di He these authors contributed equally.
    Copyright comment
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Background We aimed to compare multifunctional irrigation-assisted vacuum drainage (MIVD), vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) and the Penrose drain in treating severe multi-space deep fascial infection (DFI) in head and neck. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 113 patients who had suffered from severe multi-space DFI in head and neck and underwent surgical treatment. Patients were divided into the MIVD group, the VSD group, and the Penrose group according to their treatment. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcome data regarding infection control, clinicians’ workload, surgical procedure required, and cost were analyzed. Results Duration of antibiotic administration was significantly shorter using MIVD and VSD than Penrose drains (p = 0.002 with MIVD, p = 0.008 with VSD). Hospital stay in the MIVD group was shorter than the Penrose group ( p  = 0.034). Compared to the other two groups, more times of manual irrigation were needed in higher frequency in the Penrose group ( p  < 0.001). Longer Incision and more surgical operation were required in the VSD group than the other two groups ( p  < 0.001). The treatment cost in the VSD group was higher than the MIVD group ( p  = 0.045) and the Penrose group ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions In the treatment of severe multi-space DFI in head and neck, MIVD and VSD are superior to the Penrose drain in infection control and reduction in clinicians’ workload. Meanwhile, MIVD, with fewer surgical procedures required and less cost, seems to be a more promising method than VSD.
  • Editor: Cham: Springer International Publishing
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.