skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching

Haddaway, Neal Robert ; Collins, Alexandra Mary ; Coughlin, Deborah ; Kirk, Stuart Wray, K. Brad

PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0138237-e0138237 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Public Library of Science

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
  • Autor: Haddaway, Neal Robert ; Collins, Alexandra Mary ; Coughlin, Deborah ; Kirk, Stuart
  • Wray, K. Brad
  • Assuntos: Bias ; Biodiversity ; Case studies ; Citation indexes ; Databases, Bibliographic ; Databases, Factual ; Environmental science ; Grey literature ; Humans ; Internet ; Internet/Web search services ; Library associations ; Literature reviews ; Medical libraries ; Peer Review, Research ; Researchers ; Reviews ; Science ; Scientific papers ; Search Engine ; Search engines ; Strings ; Systematic review ; Transparency ; Upgrading ; Websites
  • É parte de: PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0138237-e0138237
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
    Conceived and designed the experiments: NH. Performed the experiments: NH AC. Analyzed the data: NH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NH. Wrote the paper: NH AC DC SK.
    Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
  • Descrição: Google Scholar (GS), a commonly used web-based academic search engine, catalogues between 2 and 100 million records of both academic and grey literature (articles not formally published by commercial academic publishers). Google Scholar collates results from across the internet and is free to use. As a result it has received considerable attention as a method for searching for literature, particularly in searches for grey literature, as required by systematic reviews. The reliance on GS as a standalone resource has been greatly debated, however, and its efficacy in grey literature searching has not yet been investigated. Using systematic review case studies from environmental science, we investigated the utility of GS in systematic reviews and in searches for grey literature. Our findings show that GS results contain moderate amounts of grey literature, with the majority found on average at page 80. We also found that, when searched for specifically, the majority of literature identified using Web of Science was also found using GS. However, our findings showed moderate/poor overlap in results when similar search strings were used in Web of Science and GS (10-67%), and that GS missed some important literature in five of six case studies. Furthermore, a general GS search failed to find any grey literature from a case study that involved manual searching of organisations' websites. If used in systematic reviews for grey literature, we recommend that searches of article titles focus on the first 200 to 300 results. We conclude that whilst Google Scholar can find much grey literature and specific, known studies, it should not be used alone for systematic review searches. Rather, it forms a powerful addition to other traditional search methods. In addition, we advocate the use of tools to transparently document and catalogue GS search results to maintain high levels of transparency and the ability to be updated, critical to systematic reviews.
  • Editor: United States: Public Library of Science
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.