Idioma:

Comparative Analysis Between Computed and Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques

Araújo, Gabriela Madeira ; Barbalho, Jimmy Charles Melo ; Dias, Tasiana Guedes de Souza ; Santos, Thiago de Santana ; Vasconcellos, Ricardo José de Holanda ; de Morais, Hécio Henrique Araújo

The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2015-11, Vol.26 (8), p.e733-e736 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Comparative Analysis Between Computed and Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques
Autor: Araújo, Gabriela Madeira ; Barbalho, Jimmy Charles Melo ; Dias, Tasiana Guedes de Souza ; Santos, Thiago de Santana ; Vasconcellos, Ricardo José de Holanda ; de Morais, Hécio Henrique Araújo
Assuntos: Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia, Dental - instrumentation ; Anesthesia, Dental - methods ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Dentistry ; Double-Blind Method ; Epinephrine - administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections ; Lidocaine - administration & dosage ; Male ; Mandibular Nerve - drug effects ; Molar, Third - surgery ; Nerve Block - instrumentation ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Perception - physiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Therapy, Computer-Assisted ; Tooth Extraction - methods ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage ; Young Adult
É parte de: The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2015-11, Vol.26 (8), p.e733-e736
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Descrição: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was to compare the computed and conventional inferior alveolar nerve block techniques in symmetrically positioned inferior third molars. Both computed and conventional anesthetic techniques were performed in 29 healthy patients (58 surgeries) aged between 18 and 40 years. The anesthetic of choice was 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine. The Visual Analogue Scale assessed the pain variable after anesthetic infiltration. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Likert Scale. Heart and respiratory rates, mean time to perform technique, and the need for additional anesthesia were also evaluated. Pain variable means were higher for the conventional technique as compared with computed, 3.45 ± 2.73 and 2.86 ± 1.96, respectively, but no statistically significant differences were found (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant differences. The average computed technique runtime and the conventional were 3.85 and 1.61 minutes, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P <0.001). The computed anesthetic technique showed lower mean pain perception, but did not show statistically significant differences when contrasted to the conventional technique.
Editor: United States
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Comparative Analysis Between Computed and Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques

Araújo, Gabriela Madeira ; Barbalho, Jimmy Charles Melo ; Dias, Tasiana Guedes de Souza ; Santos, Thiago de Santana ; Vasconcellos, Ricardo José de Holanda ; de Morais, Hécio Henrique Araújo

United States

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.